Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Oct 2008 07:33 UTC
Earlier this week we reported on the court case between Apple and PsyStar, stating they went into settlement negotiations. Details, however, were sparse. The law firm representing PsyStar has now replied to the matter, and there's good news for those of us who hope to see crazy EULA clauses tested in court.
Permalink for comment 334539
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Apple's previous clone options didn't grow the user base, but cannibalized sales from Apple of pre-existing users. It was a failure all around.
It was a failure because the clone makers made better, faster, and cheaper hardware than Apple did at the time. These days, Apple and its fans are convinced Apple makes the best hardware evar, and that the sometimes premium prices are more than justified.
If Apple's hardware is as good as everyone says it is, what's the fear for clones all about?
Member since:
2005-06-29
It was a failure because the clone makers made better, faster, and cheaper hardware than Apple did at the time. These days, Apple and its fans are convinced Apple makes the best hardware evar, and that the sometimes premium prices are more than justified.
If Apple's hardware is as good as everyone says it is, what's the fear for clones all about?