Linked by Rahul on Thu 23rd Oct 2008 14:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 334742
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-18
1. Linux is as much Unix as any OS from IBM or HP. So saying it's Unix vs Linux is kind of a stretch. It should probably be Linux is becoming #1 Unix. Yes I know that's not 100% accurate, but for most people that pretty much sums it up.
2. If systems using Cobol were still around in 2000 (and even today) you can bet that all these other Unix OSs will be in use for many years to come.
3. I don't think companies like HP and IBM really mind that Linux is replacing their brands of Unix. They still get to sell their hardware with it, and they get the support revenue that goes with those sales. But now they get to share the R&D and development cost with everybody else. Keeping up with hardware drivers and whatnot for your own brand of Unix is not an easy or cheap task, and sharing this work with a larger development community has to be a big win for everyone.
Edited 2008-10-23 17:55 UTC