A Fedora user takes a brief look at what he considers 13 of the prime features in the upcoming Fedora 10 release on end of November. "Fedora has many a projects finished or in the queue for Fedora 10. It is a mammoth and obviously unimportant to take all of them out here. So I have sorted some to best of your interests. If you are a developer, then don't worry. You have your goodie too."
Permalink for comment 334997
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Why is every complain reagrding anything opensource meant with "don't complain file a bug report!" or "well, fix it or contribute your own code/art/whatever"?
This makes one of two assumptions about the person complaining:
A)That they haven't already gone through with said action
In this case, the OP almost certainly has not gone through said action, or s/he'd have mentioned it.
B) That if they are just someone interested in USING the software and lack time/expertise to make changes/improvements that their opinions is invalid.
There's a huge difference between complaining about a default theme (highly subjective) and complaining about a broken application (objective and reproducible). Let's illustrate:
Scenario A
--------
geek1: "That girl is hideous."
geek2: "You're crazy; she is attractive."
Scenario B
----------
geek1: "foo truncates input at 2400 characters, and here is the proof..."
geek2: "Egads, you're right." (or: "Your proof is bogus.")
Frankly, I thought it was pretty encouraging that OP was referred to an appropriate discussion forum.
Member since:
2007-02-26
This makes one of two assumptions about the person complaining:
A)That they haven't already gone through with said action
In this case, the OP almost certainly has not gone through said action, or s/he'd have mentioned it.
There's a huge difference between complaining about a default theme (highly subjective) and complaining about a broken application (objective and reproducible). Let's illustrate:
Scenario A
--------
geek1: "That girl is hideous."
geek2: "You're crazy; she is attractive."
Scenario B
----------
geek1: "foo truncates input at 2400 characters, and here is the proof..."
geek2: "Egads, you're right." (or: "Your proof is bogus.")
Frankly, I thought it was pretty encouraging that OP was referred to an appropriate discussion forum.