
An interesting NYT Bits blog entry covers
Opera's mobile browser. Buried in the middle of the article is this quote: "Opera's engineers have developed a version of Opera Mini that can run on an Apple iPhone, but Apple won't let the company release it because it competes with Apple's own Safari browser." It also talks about Opera on the Wii and browsers in cars. A good read.
My Take: But back to the iPhone. As tempted as I am to just shrug it off, since Apple is free to run its App Store any way it pleases, as an enthusiastic iPhone user, I think Apple is shooting itself in the foot here, as it is with all the "competitive" apps being rejected. Apple does stand to lose some Google revenue by letting people use other browsers, but they have much more to gain by unleashing the creativity of the developer community and giving them the freedom to improve or replace core iPhone functionality. Hopefully competition from Android forces them to wake up.
Member since:
2008-10-28
In articles about them being pulled from the app store for competing with other apps I don't need. I waited in line at an Apple store for hours to get my iPhone and if I could go back in time and get an eee pc instead I would do it in a heartbeat. The iPhone is a neat little device but it is horrible as a phone, and I hate the fact that now I have sold my soul to AT&T and to Apple, a company I used to have so much respect for. What next? Blocking apps for my Macbook Pro?