Linked by David Adams on Wed 29th Oct 2008 20:55 UTC, submitted by Geir Johasen
Opera Software An interesting NYT Bits blog entry covers Opera's mobile browser. Buried in the middle of the article is this quote: "Opera's engineers have developed a version of Opera Mini that can run on an Apple iPhone, but Apple won't let the company release it because it competes with Apple's own Safari browser." It also talks about Opera on the Wii and browsers in cars. A good read. My Take: But back to the iPhone. As tempted as I am to just shrug it off, since Apple is free to run its App Store any way it pleases, as an enthusiastic iPhone user, I think Apple is shooting itself in the foot here, as it is with all the "competitive" apps being rejected. Apple does stand to lose some Google revenue by letting people use other browsers, but they have much more to gain by unleashing the creativity of the developer community and giving them the freedom to improve or replace core iPhone functionality. Hopefully competition from Android forces them to wake up.
Permalink for comment 335569
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Ridiculous
by jlarocco on Thu 30th Oct 2008 00:37 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Ridiculous"
Member since:

It doesn't make sense to argue against capitalism and against the Wall Street bailout at the same time. The oposite of capitalism would be like a big government bailout for everybody, all the time.

Massive government intervention and regulation are the anti-thesis of capitalism.

Also, your apparent view that the government is always looking out for people is a bit naive. Politicians care about one thing: keeping their cushy jobs.

Reply Parent Score: 2