Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Nov 2008 16:12 UTC, submitted by Michael
Permalink for comment 336444
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-01
I'm a great one for computer nostalgia, but the simple fact is that Windows 3.1 was utterly terrible.
In those pre-Win95 days, I was a just a kid, using Acorn RISC-OS machines at school, and an Amiga 500 (later 1200) at home. I remember my dad splashing out hundreds of pounds on a powerful PC for work -- a 486SX/25, I think, with all of 4MB RAM -- and being utterly disgusted by how terrible "Windows for Workgroups" was compared to what I was used to.
*sigh*.
Those were the days...
(On the plus side though, it didn't take me long to work out how to play Doom on it!)