Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Nov 2008 15:33 UTC, submitted by Gregory
Permalink for comment 336534
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-18
This is just a stopgap solution that probably won't really work for most people. Just like the all the crazy memory compressor software that used to be out there that tried to give you more ram with a bunch of software compression tricks. It kind of worked some of the time, and most of the time your system was slower and more unstable.
No, the real solution as always is newer technology on the hardware end. There are new kinds of flash memory coming out that are faster to read/write and can handle more write cycles. I foresee the day when people might not buy ram for mid/lower range systems because the flash storage they use for their hard drives is fast enough to use a modest 30gb of their 500gb flash drive for ram. This is similar to what's already being done on a lot of mobile devices now.
And I think this would help a lot with suspend/resume support. Yeah the hardware devices would need to be reinitialized, but your ram image could be on your hard drive so if you loose power, no big deal.