Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Nov 2008 22:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 337155
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-16
Thom, you really seem to get yourself into a Holy War here with OSNews. Perhaps you should step back from that a little.
It is right that thread count, memory allocation etc. are bogus measurements (your rebuttal about what WinMin actually is meant to be sounds bogus to me, too; as if you would really know the kind of reorganization they are doing and how it would show or not). But your article tells more than that observation. It tells that you really so goddamn want to believe in a shiny bright new Windows 7 and you want others to believe in that, too. Same as educating everybody on how well Vista finally shaped up.
Save yourself some credibility and stay more to the facts. Fact is: I wait for MS to do a release, before I judge/condemn/defend it whatsoever. You are better off doing the same.
Edited 2008-11-13 00:01 UTC