Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Nov 2008 09:39 UTC, submitted by Reyk
Permalink for comment 337208
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-02-26
Well, X runs perfectly fine on KVM/QEMU I cannot understand why people enjoy that limited proprietary clone.
However, I do not use X for my OpenBSD VMs I have them to test things I wouldn't dare to do in a real machine with real data inside.
No need for X - I have the Linux host for that.
I could probably use X as it was intended and pump apps into to my box but, as I usually just use the terminal, what I do is I forward a virtual port and communicate with it via ssh with the main tty on stdout. I have two nice puffy icons in my Xubuntu desktop, one for the "daemon" and another for the ssh sessions. Seamless desktop integration, I say.
Edited 2008-11-13 12:38 UTC