Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Nov 2008 19:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 337630
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
That may have been a strategic consideration. Adobe while developing apps on Windows, is certainly a competitor to Microsoft in many ways.
I'm not sure I buy that they are specifically leaving out the player for Windows or Mac though, as far as I know there are no 64-bit mac browsers, and while Vista ships with a 64-bit version of IE, it's tucked away for safe keeping, and there is no 64-bit build of Firefox on their site.
IDK, just seems like all the demand for a 64-bit version of Flash Player is coming from the Linux guys, so it just makes sense to release it there first, and Adobe does seem to be serious about working with the open source community, especially with Flex - and other truly open source runtime libraries (even if the player is still mostly closed source). :-)