Linked by David Adams on Thu 20th Nov 2008 04:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 337943
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
I'd kind of agree with this, if it weren't for the fact that Novell keep trying to push Microsoft technologies into Linux.
Mono and Silverlight, come on down.
Given the examples of Mono and Silverlight, one has to wonder about Novell's contributions to OO as well.
On their own there is nothing wrong with Novell's contributions, but taken in conjunction with Microsoft's patent rumblings, Ballmer talking about Linux users having "undisclosed liabilities" to microsoft, one has to be at least fretful about Microsoft-originated technologies worming their way into the Linux ecosystem.
Where is there any of the reverse happening, BTW? I thought the Microsoft/Novell deal was supposed to be all about interoperability? So where is Microsoft Office for Linux? Where is SVG rendering capaibility, Vorbis, Theora and Dirca codecs for WMP, and other W3C compliances, built in to MS Office, IE and the core Windows OS?
I very much distrust the Novell tendency to trying to build support for Microsoft proprietary formats into Linux. It would be far, far more desirable for Novell to work at helping Microsoft build support for open formats into Office/Windows/IE/WMP.
Edited 2008-11-21 01:32 UTC