Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Nov 2008 18:52 UTC
Apple "I'm about to tell you a true story. It's not about me (honest). I have this friend who submitted an application to Apple for review. After a few weeks, it came back with one of those embarrassingly stupid rejection letters that said more about the person reviewing the application than it did about the application itself. In a nutshell, the application violated one of those user interaction rules that seem to exist in certain pompous minds rather than in the actual Apple Human Interface Guidelines. [...] After a day or so of calming down, this person decided to go ahead and resubmit the application. And did so without making a single change to the application. I'm sure you know where this is going."
Permalink for comment 338138
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Feedback forbidden ?
by Imagine Engine on Sun 23rd Nov 2008 17:42 UTC in reply to "Feedback forbidden ?"
Imagine Engine
Member since:
2008-11-23

Apple can't stop a developer from telling the public why they were not approved for the App Store or why their app was pulled from the App Store. From the emailed responses I got from several third party developers it's frustrating to them why some of their apps are either blocked or removed. Nullriver's NetShare app is one such good example whereby it seems only AT&T is against their customers tethering on the iPhone. Rogers and Fido here in Canada allow tethering on their smartphone data plans, so does several other international carriers that sell the iPhone 3G. Though Apple seems to continually listen to AT&T input instead of letting the consumer make up their mind on which app they would like to download.

Reply Parent Score: 2