"It was powered by a 0.6-2.5Mhz processor (reports are inconclusive)
The 1.6 microsecond memory timing referenced in the brochure suggests the 0.6MHz figure. (1.6µs translates to 625KHz) Remember, no cache. If it did run at 2.5MHz, it ran at an *effective* 0.6MHz.
Adequate for most 1960s kitchen computing workloads. The complimentary programming course and bundled Shish-kabuntu were a nice touch, too. "
Note that 625 kHz x 4 = 2.5 MHz. Many CPUs used to require multiple clock cycles to execute instructions. That was the difference between a clock cycle and a machine cycle.
Member since:
2005-07-06
The 1.6 microsecond memory timing referenced in the brochure suggests the 0.6MHz figure. (1.6µs translates to 625KHz) Remember, no cache. If it did run at 2.5MHz, it ran at an *effective* 0.6MHz.
Adequate for most 1960s kitchen computing workloads. The complimentary programming course and bundled Shish-kabuntu were a nice touch, too. "
Note that 625 kHz x 4 = 2.5 MHz. Many CPUs used to require multiple clock cycles to execute instructions. That was the difference between a clock cycle and a machine cycle.