Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Dec 2008 22:42 UTC, submitted by anon
Permalink for comment 339038
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-05-26
Apple's complaint is that Psystar has "circumvented OS X's copy protection scheme". In order to make that complaint, Apple would have to prove that Mac OS X has, in fact, ANY copy protection scheme at all.
Checking that the hardware is made by Apple does NOT constitute a copy-protection scheme, as it does not stop discs being pirated between Macintosh owners.