Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Dec 2008 22:42 UTC, submitted by anon
Permalink for comment 339122
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-19
I still see no problem to that... they were overpriced and underpowered compared to the clones.... oh wait, isn't that the same thing as Apple? Where is IBM now? Oh wait, they're still around and still doing major things in the industry.
Oh not another Apple is way more expensive excuse? Sorry but that no longer holds up. Blah, blah, blah, we all know we can get a PC that is dirt cheap. But you get what you pay for. Show me a comparable laptop to the MacBook, just released, for the same or cheaper money. What? can't find one that looks as cool, and has the same specs, not to mention the bright LED display? Sorry but I'll save you the trip, it doesn't exist as I have tried. Sure you can get close, but it won't be an Apple and will not have the fit and finish and all the other things that make a Mac a Mac and not some wannabe PC.