Linked by David Adams on Sun 7th Dec 2008 02:06 UTC, submitted by mikemuch
Permalink for comment 339489
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-19
Why are they comparing development versions of Opera and Chrome with the stable versions of Firefox and IE?
At least the Beta versions of Shiretoko (Firefox 3.1) and IE8 should be used for comparisons, as they both include improved versions of their engines.
It also says the previous highest acid3 score on a public released version of a browser was 79 on Chrome, while I'm quite sure that the realeased version of Firefox 3.1b1 was already over 80, and the 3.1b2 due to be released is now at 93.
I'm still a fan of Opera, but not of tech journalists...
Edited 2008-12-07 10:26 UTC