Linked by David Adams on Tue 9th Dec 2008 16:46 UTC, submitted by weildish
Permalink for comment 339735
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
Looks like this would be the ideal UI for manipulating holograms around a room. The "computer" would be all around you, scanning how you interacted with real objects as well as virtual objects. I don't think it would replace all kinds of computing tasks, but I could see why some people would prefer using holograms as their UI.
Meanwhile most people on this particular website have been adapting their minds to fit the computer's way of thinking more than the other way around. Human-machine interaction is always a compromise between the two worlds, the real and the virtual, it's just a matter of where the line is drawn that defines the shape of the UI.
In the future, we may see people who "plug" directly into machines and interface like programmers would, choosing the most efficient means possible, and those who use a computer without even knowing they're using a computer by interacting in a virtual environment that completely imitates the real -- that would be the logical conclusion of the two extremes.