Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Dec 2008 15:10 UTC
Editorial states: "Microsoft (or a really smart ISV) should build a full application manager for Windows, similar to what most Linux distributions do today." Most Windows applications come with their own distinctive updating mechanism (much like Mac OS X), instead of having a centralised updating location like most Linux distributions offer. While it certainly wouldn't be harmful for Windows to gain such a feature - the question remains: isn't it time we rethink program installation and management altogether?
Permalink for comment 340338
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I agree that MacOS should have a centralized update system. Oh, wait. It does. It's called "Software Update..." The only problem is that far too many apps don't take advantage of that. They should.

NO application other than Apple's own make use of Softwsre Update because... Software Update is closed. It's Apple-only.

Reply Parent Score: 2