Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Dec 2008 15:10 UTC
Editorial InternetNews.com states: "Microsoft (or a really smart ISV) should build a full application manager for Windows, similar to what most Linux distributions do today." Most Windows applications come with their own distinctive updating mechanism (much like Mac OS X), instead of having a centralised updating location like most Linux distributions offer. While it certainly wouldn't be harmful for Windows to gain such a feature - the question remains: isn't it time we rethink program installation and management altogether?
Permalink for comment 340383
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Liquidator
Member since:
2007-03-04

the problem is you and your point.


Which of my point do you disagree with and why?

It is not representative in any way of the total population of users/installations of the given BSD operating systems.


So this comes from the BSDStats website. It clearly means the veracity of information is to be taken with a pinch of salt. Don't you think so?

Vendor want 100k paying customers minimum.


Where did you pick this information? Sounds like you made that up. I'd like to know the threshold for Adobe to decide to finance development of their software on the Unix-based platforms (except OS X). It's definitely a lot, lot more than a hundred thousand users.

Reply Parent Score: 3