Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Dec 2008 15:10 UTC
Editorial InternetNews.com states: "Microsoft (or a really smart ISV) should build a full application manager for Windows, similar to what most Linux distributions do today." Most Windows applications come with their own distinctive updating mechanism (much like Mac OS X), instead of having a centralised updating location like most Linux distributions offer. While it certainly wouldn't be harmful for Windows to gain such a feature - the question remains: isn't it time we rethink program installation and management altogether?
Permalink for comment 340438
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: hmmm..so why..
by mabhatter on Tue 16th Dec 2008 06:03 UTC in reply to "hmmm..so why.."
mabhatter
Member since:
2005-07-17

I'd agree, author doesn't know what he's saying. If you look at the typical Ubuntu install they give you half a dozen repositories to install from and you can turn them on and off. You can even add third party repositories like the famous PLF (penguin liberation front) or Automatix and the package manager software takes all the versions into account when installing software. Remove a repo and all the software versions (at least try) to drop back to the next level you have installed. It's not perfect, it still works on scripts, not working with the actual system you have, but it's way better than the other guys.

Reply Parent Score: 3