Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
Legal The legal back-and-forth between PsyStar and Apple is slowly but surely moving into the twilight zone. Not too long ago we had Apple going all black helicopter on PsyStar claiming people and/or companies other than PsyStar are involved in the clone maker's unlawful practices, even though Apple could so far not name any of them because, well, they don't know who they are yet. If that wasn't enough, PsyStar now claims that Apple's copyright on Mac OS X is invalid.
Permalink for comment 341434
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Software Copyright and Appple
by OSGuy on Thu 25th Dec 2008 03:01 UTC
OSGuy
Member since:
2006-01-01

The software copyright should only limit you on how many computers you can use the software *but* it *absolutely* should *not* limit you on the type of hardware you will be using it. That is your own right. You purchase a license and you are obliged to comply that you will not make illegal copies but when it comes to usage, I should be allowed to pick the hardware *I* want. Software and hardware are independent.

However, I am afraid if PsyStar does win, Apple's days will be numbered. Soon everyone will start doing what PsyStar does and things will get out of control since the copyright will be invalid. Imagine if HP grabbed a bunch of Windows copies and put them on PCs without consulting with MS. So a company can do this and not care what Apple says. Apple will be powerless to stop them. They will struggle.

Apple is a hardware company. Although I dislike Apple and their business practises, I believe it would be very bad if they do lose as they are proven innovators and the only way to survive would be to continue to do what they do. For the sake of Apple and the rest of the IT world, I want them to win. I don't like what they do BUT it would be better if they win. Only time will tell what they will come up with in the future -- Personal Opinion --

Edited 2008-12-25 03:08 UTC

Reply Score: 2