Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
Legal The legal back-and-forth between PsyStar and Apple is slowly but surely moving into the twilight zone. Not too long ago we had Apple going all black helicopter on PsyStar claiming people and/or companies other than PsyStar are involved in the clone maker's unlawful practices, even though Apple could so far not name any of them because, well, they don't know who they are yet. If that wasn't enough, PsyStar now claims that Apple's copyright on Mac OS X is invalid.
Permalink for comment 341440
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Software Copyright and Appple
by sagum on Thu 25th Dec 2008 05:43 UTC in reply to "Software Copyright and Appple"
sagum
Member since:
2006-01-23

The software copyright should only limit you on how many computers you can use the software *but* it *absolutely* should *not* limit you on the type of hardware you will be using it.


I don't think a copyright can limit the amount of computers you can use the software with. A copyright is just a legal writ to say who has ownership to copy.

Any software you use is bound by the terms you agree to use it by, the EULA (end user legal agreement) and that stipulates that you can instal it on 1, 2 or however many machines. it may even refer you to other legal agreements such as site or seat licensing agreements.

Generally the only thing a legal copyright owner can tell you to do with software you've brought is to not to make a backup of it for anyone other then yourself.

Remember, when you 'buy' software, you're usually buying the 'right of use' for it on the terms set out in the EULA.

Reply Parent Score: 3