Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
Legal The legal back-and-forth between PsyStar and Apple is slowly but surely moving into the twilight zone. Not too long ago we had Apple going all black helicopter on PsyStar claiming people and/or companies other than PsyStar are involved in the clone maker's unlawful practices, even though Apple could so far not name any of them because, well, they don't know who they are yet. If that wasn't enough, PsyStar now claims that Apple's copyright on Mac OS X is invalid.
Permalink for comment 341446
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Tying
by Jett on Thu 25th Dec 2008 07:48 UTC
Jett
Member since:
2007-07-08

About the best arguement I have seen why PsyStar might win is product tying.

About product tying.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tying_(commerce)
copy and paste the link the ) is left off if you just click on the link


If you buy Mac OS X seperatly why must you buy a apple computer to use it. MS was not allow to tie IE to win98 in its own OS (in the netscape IE battle) but should apple be allow to tie an OS to the computers it can run on

Edited 2008-12-25 08:01 UTC

Reply Score: 2