Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
Legal The legal back-and-forth between PsyStar and Apple is slowly but surely moving into the twilight zone. Not too long ago we had Apple going all black helicopter on PsyStar claiming people and/or companies other than PsyStar are involved in the clone maker's unlawful practices, even though Apple could so far not name any of them because, well, they don't know who they are yet. If that wasn't enough, PsyStar now claims that Apple's copyright on Mac OS X is invalid.
Permalink for comment 341487
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Hummmm!
by sbergman27 on Thu 25th Dec 2008 19:36 UTC in reply to "Hummmm!"
sbergman27
Member since:
2005-07-24

You are kidding i guess. Their filing is full of spelling, grammatical and formal mistakes, how can you call them clever?

Surely you are not suggesting that the misspellings and typos (claimed by anonymous "World of Apple" commenter "dizzle" which you have linked) should have a direct relevance to the case? If a person is murdered and the prosecutor submits documents with grammatical problems, but which are still clearly understandable, should the defendant get off the hook because of it? Besides, "dizzle" had some misspellings just in his commentary, which when pointed out, he claims not to have had his morning coffee or some such.

I think Thom summed up the relevant questions handily here:

http://www.osnews.com/thread?341458

Writing an article focusing upon grammar and spelling says more about the anonymous dizzle's agenda than about the case.

Edited 2008-12-25 19:45 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2