Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
Permalink for comment 341487
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 11:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-24
Surely you are not suggesting that the misspellings and typos (claimed by anonymous "World of Apple" commenter "dizzle" which you have linked) should have a direct relevance to the case? If a person is murdered and the prosecutor submits documents with grammatical problems, but which are still clearly understandable, should the defendant get off the hook because of it? Besides, "dizzle" had some misspellings just in his commentary, which when pointed out, he claims not to have had his morning coffee or some such.
I think Thom summed up the relevant questions handily here:
http://www.osnews.com/thread?341458
Writing an article focusing upon grammar and spelling says more about the anonymous dizzle's agenda than about the case.
Edited 2008-12-25 19:45 UTC