Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Jan 2009 08:43 UTC, submitted by amjith
Permalink for comment 342915
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2008-04-10
I know there's an etiquette to observe when assigning version numbers to your software. Major internal updates get a number before the point, while minor internal or interface changes get one after it, but really, it's their software. If they want to call it 2.0, I won't begrudge them that. It seems like a pretty big internal change to enhance existing CSS support and switch to completely different HTTP code. This is pre-beta, maybe the final release of 2.0 will have enough visible feature changes to justify that number.