Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Jan 2009 23:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 343084
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-28
"Microsoft is still resolutely refusing to admit they might have blown it with Vista, even a tiny weeny little bit"
I'm an Apple guy but I've Vista recently and its not all that bad. Yes, its still slow on older hardware (i.e. 2003) and on PCs with <2GB RAM but on a modern computer it runs just fine. The relatively frequent BSODs and crashes that happened to the RTM are now gone (in SP1) and SP1 has fixed up most of the little performance and stability issues there were. Vista may not have had the "warmest welcome" on release but its really alright now that they have fixed up its main problems.
And as for power consumption, you ought to put things into perspective. In the big picture, computers hardly use any power. My huge Xeon DP system uses about 5 cents of power per hour. Even if that doubles to 10 cents, it still won't be of any concern to me. Things like furnaces and water heaters and air conditioners are what use the power in homes.
Edited 2009-01-12 00:21 UTC