Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Jan 2009 23:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 343123
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-02
Google it appears is no better at the energy/carbon/pollution thing:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7823387.stm
It seems we must all (users, OS providers, network providers, search providers) start thinking *very* seriously about this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7821754.stm
NB from the latter:
"Casey Harrell, toxics campaigner for Greenpeace, said progress had been made but there was room for improvement.
"We're not arguing any more about whether green is good - we're arguing about the definition of green and the pace at which we're getting there," he said.
The campaign group said six companies had refused to take part in the survey - Apple, Asus, Microsoft, Nintendo, Palm and Philips.
Greenpeace said it was disappointing that Apple had refused to cooperate for the second year running, especially since its new range of Macbooks could have scored well."