Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Jan 2009 23:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 343129
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-11-12
Why can't we buy a powerful 2D multimedia video card that only uses 20 watts for under $100?
A Radeon 4350 does HD playback and has a price tag of 30€ (Germany). Okay, it needs 25 Watts but it's pretty close to what you want.
Back to topic:
Vista may run ok on new Hardware, but it broke compatibility with a lot of old apps AND with a lot of old Hardware. Both of which is bad for the corporate guys. They wouldn't throw out perfectly good stuff just because an OS update requires it!
OTOH, Vista didn't break compatibility enough to finally get rid of all those old design flaws. Most of which date back to NT, 95 or even Mess-Dos...