Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Jan 2009 22:51 UTC
Permalink for comment 343266
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-06-02
When 4.0 came out, the hype was "this is the release". When it was completely unusable, people started saying... "just wait for 4.1, it will be the one"... 4.2 is coming, and I already get this feeling that someone at KDE just made sure to complicate more the "K Menu" adding 3 different searches engines or inserting this time an artificial intelligent auto-completion form. Each release the same old story.
There's a saying "If there are two heads, then it's a monster". It reflects well how projects coordinated by many people are. It feels like every developer wants his useless great idea inside the UI, killing all the UI consistency. That's been KDE 4 storyline since day 1.
Oxygen is one of the worst UI's around. I sincerely wanted it to be replaced, but KDE-dev is a parliament - not an enterprise pushing for market share.
And no, I won't even try 4.2.
Perhaps things will change when the majority of distros just drop KDE off as their default desktop.