Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Jan 2009 22:37 UTC
While we're on the subject of netbooks today, I ran across a story by Ars Technica's Erica Sadun, who writes for Ars' Infinite Loop (Apple) section. She poses that Apple already sells a netbook: the iPod Touch and the iPhone. I've heard many people make this claim before (including Steve Jobs himself), but I find it very hard to see the iPod Touch and the iPhone as netbooks.
Permalink for comment 343413
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So if someone brought out a iPhone port of openoffice.org would it be a netbook the? .It already has a webbrowser and email, which other bit of software is it missing, does google docs work with them, do they count as the 'missing software' ?
Isn't it a bit like saying a Linux box is not an PC becuae it doesn't run Photoshop (ignoring WINE for a second).
It seems to me no one has a real arguement against the iPhone / iPod Touch being a netbook without restricting the definition of what a netbook is to deliberately exclude Apple devices,
Member since:
2006-02-28
So if someone brought out a iPhone port of openoffice.org would it be a netbook the? .It already has a webbrowser and email, which other bit of software is it missing, does google docs work with them, do they count as the 'missing software' ?
Isn't it a bit like saying a Linux box is not an PC becuae it doesn't run Photoshop (ignoring WINE for a second).
It seems to me no one has a real arguement against the iPhone / iPod Touch being a netbook without restricting the definition of what a netbook is to deliberately exclude Apple devices,