Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Jan 2009 20:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 343669
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-11-12
The second contract is the the EULA which you enter into when you click through. Its independent of the sales contract. This may or may not be binding, in particular, the clause which forbids you to install on non-Apple hardware may or may not be finding. This also may or may not be a license.
But the sale by which you acquired your copy was a sale, it was not a license. Read Softman.
Do you think Apple's lawyers are too stupid to make their License bulletproof? This is, again, covered in the EULA as "You own the media on which the Apple Software is recorded but Apple and/or Apple's licensor(s) retain ownership of the Apple Software itself." By installing OSX on whatever machine, you have to agree to that license. There is no way around it as long as the license is not invalidated by law.
Oh, please! Apple hardware is EXACTLY the same as in the beige box. They use Intel CPUs, nvidia chipsets, ATI graphics cards, just to name a few. Wired and Psystar would not have been able to run OSX on non-Apple hardware if it were any different.