Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Jan 2009 11:30 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems We've been able to drop the world of 32bit for a while now, with 64bit processors and support for them being prevalent in all popular, modern operating systems. However, where Mac OS X and Linux seem to make the move to 64bit rather effortlessly, Windows has more problems. Even though 32bit applications should run fine on 64bit Windows, some don't; and to make matters worse, drivers need to be 64bit, as there's no support for 32bit drivers in 64bit versions of Windows. Still, Gizmodo claims that with Windows 7, the time is right to take the plunge. But really, is it so? And why do Linux and Mac OS X seem to handle the transition so much easier?
Permalink for comment 344768
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
HARDWARE vendors are to blame
by gfolkert on Wed 21st Jan 2009 17:57 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Windows vendors are to blame"
gfolkert
Member since:
2008-12-15

I was extrapolating... I guess a paradigm shift without a clutch is difficult for some people.

I was trying to be glib. I guess I should *REALLY* have been blunt and very straight forward. Explaining a joke and/or ideal just ruins it, in my opinion. Come on stop thinking this way.

Here it is the way I guess I should have typed it:

This is a HARDWARE vendor problem, not a Linux problem. If vendors would get their act together, it wouldn't be so difficult and we could have all moved ^to Linux^ a long time ago.


Okay NOW... think of the horizon on that comment.

Drivers in general are not an issue, but access to the hardware specs or source code (and the "binary blobs decompiled") typically *IS* when it comes to Linux and *BSDs.

I guess you have to be very short sighted to not see where I was going.

Reply Parent Score: 2