Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 12:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 344929
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-27
Obviously apple are worried about the palm pre ... and it also shows that software patents are stupid ... multi touch is not an apple invention anyway. Who looses out? the consumers and clients. Honestly i hope that no court will take apple's claims seriously ...the palm pre form what one can tell from the preview etc. has a lot more to offer than the iphone and has some very nice features ...
"but Palm seems to directly emulate touch interface that iPhone innovated"
again ... apple has not innovated multitouch ... they may have been the first to put it into a product, but htat is an entirely different matter
Edited 2009-01-22 13:05 UTC