Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 12:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 344997
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
the radio was already invented, as was the winding mechanism.
the 'invention' was still his to patent as he proposed a new way of using those technoligies together
His ‘invention’ was a better method of producing energy from winding. That is the only thing that his patent should be able to cover.
If you invent another method for doing the same thing, it’s a new invention and not covered…
At least, that’s the original intention of patents