Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 15:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 345016
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-10-23
For a company that have $50 billion in the bank, that does over $50 billion in profit a year, to lay off employees is a big shame.
As always, the workers pay for the share holders.
Where is this society going? The share holders are supposed to take the risk and responsibility in exchange for the huge profits they are pumping on the back of the workers.
So this year is tough? They didn't increase their profit by 30% but only 10% year over year? Too bad they will only get $50 billion instead of the $100 billions they expected? Come on! The workers made the software, the workers marketed the software, the workers sold the software and the workers are layed off when your profits are not as high as you expected?
How can they look at their face in the mirror they bought several thousands of dollars and not see they are assholes? How can they go buy their 12th Ferrari and fire 5000 people? Those guys should really be ashamed of themselves.
Edited 2009-01-22 18:30 UTC