Linked by weildish on Sat 24th Jan 2009 22:44 UTC
Permalink for comment 345445
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-12
Who is "we"?
What does "harmful" mean?
Does it mean to you that a company invents something unique and then profits from their invention, so that other companies are forced to find other ideas of their own?
I find that to be a good thing, not a bad thing. That's one of the points to patents. It forces others to come up with more ideas, rather than all using one idea and not advancing.
Software patents are no different from others. You can be sure that if computers were around during the time our country was formed (and all others as well), patents would have also covered software.
The only problem is that the software industry moves faster than others, and so software patents are too long. As I've mentioned, it should likely be for 7 years, as that seems to be about the time the industry gets turned upside down.
Edited 2009-01-25 20:33 UTC