Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Jan 2009 11:56 UTC
Permalink for comment 345543
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I don't believe you ...
What is unfair is letting Microsoft break the law , all the time will asking it's competition to follow it. They should strip Microsoft of all it's worldwide profit for the years of their commited crime.
Criminal should not be allowed to benefit from breaking the laws.
Unlike Microsoft they have not broken any law , mocked justice system and wasted repeatidly the time of the judges and courts and lied under oath. They don't spy on other country for one country either.
They are not dicussing the monopoly law , that Microsoft still break today here , but tying law , forcing two different and separate product on consumer at the expanse of others.
No , they do not , many judge worldwide statuated on that.
What would be nice is to have Microsoft barred from default install.
Every governement does , do you think radio communication standards and pollution emission have no cost on car makers ? Beside you can change both easily after sale , they both have thriving radio and engine after market too.
Where as with IE removing it is not easy or even really doable and since they put the price at zero their is no real after market.
Yes , criminal reprehsensive activity , got to give you that one ...
It's their territory , they make the law , follow them or dont do business there , it's really simple.
OEM are not breaking the law Microsoft is ...
Microsoft gave them Vista ...
They are the only one found guitly of having broken the law and not respecting the punishment imposed on them ...
No , your an ASTROTURFER.
You prefer to support criminal who break all the laws at the expanse of the rest of the market and of end user's ...
It was not , Microsoft was allowed to make it's case , waist the court time , again in this other law breaking case , go to it's limit and even beyond again.