Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Jan 2009 11:56 UTC
Permalink for comment 345653
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
There could simply be a design to have the equivalent of MSHTML for internal-to-the-OS purposes (such as displaying help pages) that was incapable of being fed with data from the web.
This is AFAIK the way that KDE4 has divorced the web-facing konqueror from the internal-to-the-OS rendering functions of Qt. Qt 4 has an internal version of webkit. Konqueror still uses KHTML. The two are entirely separate pieces of code. One can remove konqueror without disturbing Qt4 or the rest of the KDE4 desktop in any way.
Edited 2009-01-27 03:10 UTC