Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Jan 2009 20:58 UTC
Permalink for comment 346247
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 11:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-04-13
I wonder if SkyOS wouldn't benefit more if they had a kind of proprietary open source model. Have the license allow only a single, non-commercial community version which the community could manage and contribute to. Have a clause in the license that fully open sources SkyOS if Robert ups and leaves, to indemnify community contributers from losing their efforts. They Robert can continue to work away in his own bubble whilst the community turns SkyOS into a usable OS, and once it is ready for prime time, "SkyOS Corp" or whatever the trading name is, can make money from support and services.
Ideas.....