Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Feb 2009 21:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 346818
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-04-22
Anyone else find it ironic that in these threads the ones complaining about DRM and Vista are:
1.) People that are not affected by DRM, because...
2.) They are people that would not use a Microsoft OS or product in the first place
3.) Generally have no clue to what and how DRM is.
But it is the one theme certain people just love to bring up. Funny, because I really have never seen an actual Vista user complain about DRM. Now I base this upon frequent visits to several digital media and multimedia forums. Funny because does anyone want to try and make me believe for an instant should DRM be removed these same individuals would load up Vista? Windows 7?
Again, problem is not DRM in Vista, but the fact DRM exists. Just a wild thought, but does anyone even bother to ask why it is there in the first place? What caused media companies to rush to this?
First off before complaining about DRM, at least take the time to learn what it is, how it is implemented, and what exactly it does. And in the end, it is still always the media owner who makes the decision whether to put DRM in their content.
Back to the topic, I am not surprised that their is slow adoption. This has nothing to do with Vista at all. Take that out of the equation completely, or imagine if Vista was flawless. There would still be slow adoption for two reasons. First, do these companies have a need to migrate/upgrade? Second, with Windows 7 coming out just a few years after, why spend the money on 6, when 7 is so near? Personally I am not one of those who feels the need to get the latest greatest of any product. Fast production/development cycles usually do not benefit the consumer. While it may satisfy some geeks or fans of said product, that does not translate to real need.