Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Feb 2009 21:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 346864
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
And you have that choice. It's as simple as not running an OS that conflicts with what you want. "
Indeed, that is the ideal solution ... for me. Now.
However, in and of itself, it is insufficient. If Microsoft gets away with Windows-DRM on the majority of hardware in the future, then it is possibly that content providers will decide then to supply only Windows-DRM content.
If that happens, then I will become disenfranchised out of being able to enjoy media content where and when I want, even if I am willing to pay for it. This will happen through no fault of my own, but rather through the laziness of many others (sheeple). That is not a good potential outcome ... for anyone (other than perhaps big media).
Better for me to point out the pitfalls (for the average consumer) of DRM and lock-in right now, in the hope that the "there is no harm in Vista DRM" propagandist myth might die an immediate death right away.