Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Feb 2009 07:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 347064
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
1) I can understanding killing off PowerPC, that makes sense BUT I think the idea of killing off the Core Solo is pretty crap - at the very least they should have 'recommended' a dual core but still allow those who want to run iLife on their core solo to continue on doing as they did. People could still use it whilst at the same time realising that their machine is underpowered and things might take a little longer than if they had a dual core.
2) Regarding this statement, "If I had bought a dual quad-core PowerMac G5 2.5 years ago for three kidneys and a liver, I'd be pretty pissed off right about now" - I (along with many others) warned and I warned and I warned and I warned - but people didn't listen to me. I said it was a stupid idea to purchase a G5 given that there is a move to Intel.
Guess what? no one listened to me (and people like me) - and now this group of complainers are now swarming websites like this - pissing an moaning after being full warned as to the consequences of their purchasing decision. Please explain to me why the slightest bit of sympathy should be shed for those who went and purchased a massive upgrade knowing that there was a limited life span to it?