Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Feb 2009 14:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 347126
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-16
...is choice.
And choice here doesn't mean I have to select every single small program or even edit the code to fit my needs
Because of what? Because many others do it and are allowed to share their work. By that, they add real value to the software itself.
It is important to continue with this work, and it is far from being as redundant as it may seem from an outside perspective. First of all, the "one fits all" product doesn't exist. It is fine that there are mainstream products, but also important that the niches are filled as well. Second, redundancy based on competition is how market economy works. And the cases where market economy doesn't work well -- like creating monopolies -- are very well prevented by the free software principles (licenses).
Edited 2009-02-04 15:26 UTC