Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Feb 2009 07:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 347198
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-05
Isn't that kind of the point of Snow Leopard, to cut down the footprint? How could Apple do that if they still had code in there to support both the G4s and the Intel chips? The G4 support code is huge.
The Universal Binary was just a stepping stone to bridge the gap between the old CPU architecture and the new. I don't think any reasonable person expected Universal Binaries to be the standard from here on out. I think the Universal Binaries have served their purpose and it is now time for them to start saying goodbye.
I don't know why anybody is upset by this move either. At least Apple provided great support during the transition (through two major OS releases), unlike Microsoft, who releases an OS that is incompatible in many ways from their old OS and provides no transition support whatsoever.
Edited 2009-02-04 20:05 UTC