Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Sep 2005 19:40 UTC, submitted by jeanmarc
Permalink for comment 34723
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
There is, however, some shadiness as to how you must distribute the code. "Equivalent manners", that's easy if you ie. can download the binary; in that case it is mostly normal to also post the src online. However, theoratically, I could tattoo the source code on my ass, take a digital photo of it, and send that photo to whomever requests the source. It would technically be no violation of the gpl.
That is a blatant violation of the GPL. The GPL requires that the source code be distributed as "machine-readable source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange." A picture of a tattoo on your ass is most definitely not a medium customarily used for software interchange and is not machine-readable source code.
Now, how come we can't mod down "OSN Staff" when they are continually posting crap like this?