Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Feb 2009 14:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 347252
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-08-11
Today the short answer, for the most, is Ubuntu. But that is always subject to change, which is a good thing.
Yep and as someone who doesn't particularly like ubuntu (nothing wrong with it and i do still respect it), I'd still be happy if software writers targetted ubuntu. Other linux vendors could still easily make sure any ubuntu software ran fine on their distro - and indeed 99% of software written for ubuntu WILL run unmodified on most other mainstream linux distros.
We have a standard base, standard libraries, standard filesystem structure (within reason) - so writing linux apps is already pretty easy. I think we're heading in the right direction.
It doesn't please everyone, but if you're really into Linux then you probably like the way things are going more or less.