Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Feb 2009 14:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 347297
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-05
Linus is quite right - one of the biggest strengths of Linux is that there are so many distributions. But the problem is that there is a very low level of compatibility between these distros. That fragments the market badly and severely limits the adoption of Linux by people who care less about configuring their systems than just using them.
Microsoft has the reverse of this problem. They try and make their products into a one size fits all solution, and it just doesn't work. There are always people who's needs are not quite met by Mirosoft software, but who are too small of a market for MS to care about. OSS allows even these tiny markets to be catered to.
LSB is a nice start, but it's only a start. Until software developers can target "Linux" as a platform instead of so many distros, Linux will unfortunately never gain the adoption levels of Windows or even Mac. It won't even really "be" a platform in the eyes of developers, commercial or otherwise.
Having one big distro muscle out the others is a very dumb way of gaining compatibility, and you would lose a lot of what makes Linux cool. A better way would be to get all these guys to agree on some basic principles regarding underlying filesystems and storage locations. Perhaps having a basic test app would help, where if that app runs without modification then your OS can be certified? Similar to the Acid test website as someone else said?
As it is there are endless battles about trivial things and nobody ever wins, so no progress is made.