Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Feb 2009 21:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 347381
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Perhaps they got a hilareously good price from Microsoft on XP, and they still can sell for a few euros more because it has XP, and everybody knows that Microsft software is expensive.
Also, We have to realize that Linux is not without cost for HP, as they will have to provide support for it. Having support teams that can handle both XP and Linux may have proven too expensive.
The fact the HP now, stops selling Linux tells us little of what the customrs really wants, just that HP will make more money this way. Of course Microsoft would like us to think that HP does this on public demand, but that's another matter.