Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Feb 2009 07:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 347467
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-14
It's not true that they've been "artificially" killed. Apple did what almost every software company would do, and looked at the cost of supporting those platforms and the money they would make by doing so.
Also, you mentioned buying a "normal x86"... Macs now are normal x86 systems. The main reason Apple's cutting support for older systems is because they transitioned to "normal x86".
You also mentioned running a current Linux distribution on an old PC - can't you do that on the old Mac as well? It seems the only problem here is that Apple doesn't support older systems with newer software as well as Microsoft. That's pretty much a solid fact, but keep in mind that supporting a completely different architecture is not the same as supporting older and less powerful machines.
Apple's hardware and software have always been very much tied together, but people should start seeing things for how they are now. Apple sells computers that can run Mac OS X, Windows or Linux as well as any other PC.