Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Thu 12th Feb 2009 16:47 UTC
Permalink for comment 348700
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-05
Apple are funny.
After Leopard they're very strict about user interface styles(exept "pro" programs), but completely dump it on Windows.
I can understand why though. Their interface is a brand, and they're using their Windows programs to advertise for OS X. I don't think it's working out that well though. All their interfaces on Windows is usually not very stable and behaves weird.
I guess part reason they get away with it is that nobody(including Microsft themselves) seem to care all that much about GUI consistency on Windows. Just look at Office 2007. Except Firefox maybe.